The Outdoor Recreation Center of Wendell, which charges a one-time $100 registration fee plus daily $6 admission, has since deleted the guidelines for using the pool from its Facebook page.
John Freeman, who co-owns the swimming pool on Wendell Blvd. with his wife Teresa, told ABC11 on Monday that he didn't understand the attention around his rules - which have been posted inside the pool office on the property for the last six years.
Number seven on the list of 14 rules states, "No baggy pants, no dread-locks/weaves/extensions or revealing clothes will be permitted or you will be asked to leave."
Wendell pool owner says he’s considering legal action against social media users blasting the pool for ‘racist’ rule banning baggy pants, dreadlocks/weaves/extensions. @ABC11_WTVD #ABC11 pic.twitter.com/8lKVyIP2jN— Andrea Blanford (@AndreaABC11) June 17, 2019
Freeman said Teresa would have been the one to post a picture of the guidelines to the ORC's Facebook page.
The ORC has since deleted the post, but social media users are calling the pool "racist," posting screen grabs of the guidelines in the comments on the ORC's Facebook page.
"It did look racist, a racist statement," Diana Powell, Executive Director of Justice Served NC told ABC11 outside the ORC Monday.
Powell said being the community activist she is, people were tagging her in the controversial Facebook posts over the weekend. She decided to go straight to the source Monday and ask Freeman about it herself.
"He told me that his wife is--they're not racist," said Powell. "His wife just actually just made a mistake."
Freeman said he doesn't want people walking around the pool in front of children "with their britches down" and doesn't want artificial hair getting stuck in the pump, causing the pool to shutdown for three days for maintenance.
He said 381 families of varying ethnicities are members of the ORC and he tries to "accommodate any and everybody."
Other social media users are sharing screen grabs of two different follow-up posts from the ORC that have also been deleted.
In one post signed by John and Teresa Freeman, the owners apologized for their ignorance of the meaning of the word "dread-locks."
The statement went on to say the rules should have stated "NO artificial hair" would be allowed.
In another post, the ORC explains the reason for its "NO hair attachments" policy is the because a CPO (Certified Pool Owners) class told businesses to not allow any hair extensions in their pool because it could get in the strainers and into the pump, causing an automatic shutdown of three days.
A CPO instructor told ABC11 that excuse was a stretch.
"In 50+ years operating commercial swimming clubs (owned/operated a large community pool management company in Northern Virginia) never have I heard of or experienced a pump or filter system damaged by hair," the CPO instructor explained.
The instructor said strainers are designed to prevent hair and other material from damaging the pool's pump.
"Strainers are installed to prevent hair and other material from getting into the pump, that is their purpose. There was a time (many decades ago), when swimmers with long hair were required to wear bathing caps because of the argument that hair lost in the pool would block up the filter system, so perhaps this thinking is still lingering. Experience proved it was not a concern," the CPO instructor explained.
Freeman and his wife plan to talk with their lawyer about any action they can take against people who have publicly called them racist.
"If they call me racist, they can put it in writing and we will deal with it at the courthouse," said Freeman.
Powell said she hopes the Freemans will change the wording of their rules to not directly target a specific culture.
"Maybe we can sit down and come to the table and kind of reason together," Powell said.