Cooper' executive order, which went into effect Monday at 5 p.m., said bars, restaurants, hotels and clubs could sell alcoholic mixed drinks to-go. The order, he said would discourage people from congregating indoors, as well as provide an economic boost for the state's bars and restaurants. The order also allowed businesses to sell alcoholic beverages after the 9 p.m. curfew for on-site drinks.
But the memo, addressed to all North Carolina sheriffs from executive vice president and general counsel Eddie Caldwell, said: "current State law does not authorize mixed alcoholic beverages to be sold for carry-out."
Gov. Roy Cooper urges North Carolinians not to travel for holidays
Caldwell went on to say that he's not aware of any provision in the law that would allow the governor or the chair of the ABC Commission to override the existing statute.
Furthermore, Caldwell wrote that state law requires that any alcoholic beverage in the passenger part of a car, including the driver's seat, any passenger seats, or any part of the car that would be in reach of a passenger or driver, be in its original, unopened container. Therefore, even mixed drinks that have been sealed according to Cooper's order would need to be transported in the trunk of the car, he said.
But Cooper's office responded on Wednesday, saying bars and restaurants can continue on as promised.
A statement from a Governor's Office spokesperson said: The Governor's Office works to ensure that executive orders adhere to state law and has consulted with the Department of Justice and received concurrence from the Council of State without objection in allowing to-go beverages. Local law enforcement should continue to enforce the Governor's executive orders and state law.
The sheriff's office said the point of the memo was not to tell local sheriff's offices what to do, but rather to provide information.
Sen. Phil Berger's (R-Rockingham) office sent the following statement to ABC11: "There's a question as to whether Gov. Cooper has the authority to make this decision, even with Council of State approval. The Sheriffs Association's legal interpretation is likely correct. Now, whether someone sues over it is a different question. On the merits of the policy, Sen. Berger personally supports a temporary change in law, but he's only one vote of 50 and sufficient support within the Senate did not materialize when the issue came up earlier this year."