In documents filed Friday in U.S. District Court, Jeffrey Kessler, the lead attorney for Brady and the NFL Players Association, referred to Goodell's written ruling against Brady as a "propaganda piece" and claimed Brady was judged by a different standard from when he was first suspended to when his appeal was upheld.
After stating in the Wells report that Brady was "generally aware" of the deflating of footballs, Kessler said, the league asserted Brady was the mastermind of the scheme. Kessler said this assertion couldn't be used as the basis for upholding Brady's suspension since it wasn't found in the original report.
Kessler also said Goodell's ruling showed "a clearly biased agenda, not an effort at fairness and consistency."
"It is more smear campaign than reasoned decision," Kessler wrote, as earlier reported by the Boston Herald.
Judge Richard Berman has instructed both sides to attempt to reach a settlement and to tone down rhetoric in the case. There apparently was little progress Wednesday when Brady and Goodell appeared in Berman's court. Settlement talks were held Thursday, although the sides took Friday off.
Goodell upheld the suspension on July 29 when Brady appealed, leading to the suit.
Both sides are due in court again next Wednesday.
Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.
Brady, Goodell don't have to reappear
ESPN's Sal Paolantonio explains U.S. District Judge Richard Berman's decision that Tom Brady and Roger Goodell won't be required to reappear for the settlement conference on Wednesday.